🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households pays $27,000 annually for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $17,000 for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now the government is shut down due to political disagreements regarding subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How medical professionals receive payment changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income must contribute about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I can name dozens of businesses that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When including these expenses versus our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and company payments. And, like much of federal defense, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for small businesses like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer have access to our employees' health histories for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a better and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries with the best healthcare globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we take serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.